The social media Premier League table

27 February 2012, 17:02

Last week I wrote a very short post about whether it mattered if Premier League football clubs were any good at using Twitter and I decided that it doesn’t. The basis for this conclusion was that the loyalty of your average football supporter trumps the need for new and interesting content. Hardly a ground breaking conclusion, however this realisation also made me think about how we could better discover who’s top of the social media league table.

Taking inspiration from Richard Bailey’s #socialstudent experiment I’ve used two analytical tools to study the social media footprint of the members of the English Premier League, adding the scores from both together and then halving that number to come up with the total. See where your club places below:


TeamFollowersKloutPeer IndexTOTAL
1Chelsea672,155776470.5
2Manchester City245,280765867
3Liverpool763,632785064
4Arsenal1,278,585804763.5
5Tottenham Hotspur147,264695863.5
6Bolton Wanderers17,096596260.5
7Norwich City28,722665359.5
8Aston Villa41,389635157
9Fulham35,203644856
10Sunderland37,246664656
11Wolverhampton Wanderers27,740644554.5
12West Bromwich Albion10,922585054
13Everton41,993664053
14Newcastle United50,158614352
15Queens Park Rangers23,887604050
16Stoke City21,738553344
17Wigan Athletic10,173563244
18Blackburn Rovers13,691493240.5

(N.B. You may have noticed that Manchester United and Swansea City don’t feature. There’s a good reason for this, mainly the lack of a Twitter account for the former and an incomplete set of metric data for the latter. Don’t worry though, should either situation change I’ll post an updated list as soon as possible!)

There are a couple of interesting points to come out of this exercise, the main one being that while followers are important they are not the be all and end all. Despite a gulf of over one million followers the combined Klout and PeerIndex scores of North London rivals Arsenal and Spurs are exactly the same. Further down the list there are examples of clubs with a smaller number of followers sneaking ahead of the more recognised names.

Unfortunately I don’t expect to see Chelsea fans dancing in the streets of south west London tonight on the back of this post, after all the reliability of metric data is still up for some debate. That said I still think there’s enough here to give those of us who use social media professionally some food for thought. It’s becoming apparent that there’s more to life than just followers.

More from Opinion

Sign up for curated sports digital marketing news direct to your inbox.

Latest posts

How FC Midtjylland transformed their social strategy

How FC Midtjylland transformed their social strategy

The digital landscape of Danish football has been rather stale for some years. Many clubs have been reluctant to focus on developing this side of their organisation, which has caused them to fall behind, become understaffed, and lacking an understanding of the...